Posted by: GBMP | November 2, 2011

Hello & Welcome!

GBMP is thrilled to launch The Lean Thinking Network community blog site. Along with our YouTube Channel and the Old Lean Dude blog, we hope to be able to provide participants with a plethora of places to access exceptional content on all things Lean & Continuous Improvement – plus several ways to network with a like-minded community of Lean practitioners. Don’t forget. In the interest of Continuous Improvement, please do not hesitate to let us know if you have any suggestions on how we can improve. (To subscribe to listen to them using I-Tunes, go to I-Tunes, select podcasts and then search for the “lean thinking network” and then subscribe.)

There are two types of podcasts we feature here: e2 podcasts and “sacs” podcasts.

1. e2 Podcasts are “twitter – like” – 5 minutes or less and easily digest.  We call them “Dwight’s pwitters” focusing on the people side of continuous improvement.

2. “Sacs” (Scientific Application of Common Sense) Podcasts are short stories, told by continuous improvement practitioners, concerning complicated problems being solved by simple, effective and sustainable countermeasures.

Use the categories on the right to find what you’re looking for or just scroll down the home page to see what’s new. Interested in developing a regional network? We can help you keep everyone in the loop (See our PA Lean Network link.)

This is a special Guest Blog by Andrew Bishop, Continuous Improvement Consultant, Lancaster, PA. Enjoy!

The fourth rule implied in the work observed by Spear and Bowen at Toyota (from “The DNA of the Toyota Production System”, Harvard Business Review) says that all improvement should proceed as close as possible to the front line, using the scientific method and under the guidance of a teacher.   That’s great if you work at Toyota and your manager is a teacher of the Toyota Way… or if your company is already doing really well, so you’ve got a pile of cash to hire consultants to help you improve… but what about the rest of us, out on our own with little cash to throw around?

Reading books and blogs, taking classes and going to conferences is great (tremendous in fact – it’s the only way I know many of my teachers), but learning that isn’t IN gemba isn’t ABOUT gemba.  You’ve got to go see.  You’ve got to be there with a teacher.

Fortunately for me, coming from a cash-strapped organization and trying to boot-strap lean, I came upon a structured network of lean thinkers in our region early on in my lean learning.  It has made all the difference.

We talked to each other, we toured each others work sites, and we talked some more.  We shared stories of progress and frustration, and shared lessons learned and topics of interest.  And while I learned a lot visiting other network members’ sites, some of the best learning came after the group toured my OWN operation and offered constructive feedback – support and criticism.  The things they saw and told us about, the best practices and the problems, have helped us along the way.

When we don’t have mentors inside our organizations, lean leaders who already know the moves, to whom do we turn?  Study what you can find and seek out teachers, of course, but don’t neglect the practical impact of networking with others practicing lean.

Posted by: GBMP | February 14, 2012

e2 #7: Don’t Give Me Data, I Want Facts


(click on the player to listen)

Welcome to GBMP’s “Everybody, Everyday” Podcast – “Don’t Give Me Data, I Want Facts”.

I am sure you have heard this before.

Years ago my consulting business focused on shop floor control.  Back then (mid-1980’s) most companies did not have sufficient or timely information to effectively manage their business and/or make good decisions fast.

With scarcity of data as my opportunity and means of collecting more data my selling point, I would help business with their informational needs with the objective of having accurate and timely data to make better decisions.  My personal objective was to become the local expert on shop floor control and eventually bar coding.

Years later I worked for a mid-range, Manufacturing Software company demonstrating the software up and down the east coast.  Data again, was the sales focus and through this process I became more and more an advocate of less data was better.

Quite a transition from more is better to less is better.  Now let me tell you my story as to how and why I developed this new thinking.

I have witnessed or heard the following:

  • We can’t have single piece flow, we would have to get up after every piece to enter the data into the production control system.
  • “I spend more time punching the clock than I do making toast” Bruce Hamilton from GBMP’s“Toast Value Stream Mapping” video
  • A experienced data entry operator will make one error in every three hundred key strokes.  How many unintentional mistakes do you or your people make?
  • Our perpetual inventory control systems is out of control, I have to get up, walk to our materials department and check what we actually have, before I can answer a customers question.
  • Every time we have to make a substitute from our standard bill or materials I have to do two additional transactions…..1) add the standard part back in and 2) deduct the substituted part.  Sometimes I just forget to do it, or don’t have the time.  Hey my job is to get the parts to where they are needed when they are needed.  The stupid system can wait.

I have learned that frequently, the more data you collect the more errors you collect.  If you won’t bet a weeks wages on the precision of your data, then perhaps you should rethink your data system and needs.

What is your experience?

What is too much data?

When do you have enough data?

How accurate is your data?

Does your work-in-process move so slowly that  you need to track each status change?

How much time do your skilled operators spend walking to and from the computer/bar code station and entering data?


Click speaker to play

“Meet” Tom McDevitt, Quality, Safety & Continuous Improvement Manager at the Rose Corporation in Reading, PA.

Dwight’s interview with Tom provides a compelling argument for the use of standardized work, even in a one-of-a-kind/engineered-to-order environment.  The 8-month value stream mapping and standardized work project enabled them to increase throughput to keep pace with customer demand. As a result, they achieved a 20% reduction in cycle time (which had a big impact on their bottom line).

Tom and Dwight also discuss Rose Corp’s success overcoming employees’ concerns about implementing lean and creating a culture of continuous improvement.

We hope Tom’s story will inspire you to share yours.  Please use the comment section below to join the conversation.

Posted by: GBMP | January 24, 2012

e2 #6: Communication Kata with Meryl Runion

Part 3 of 3: “Communication Kata: The PDCA cycle for communication and measuring success.”

In this installment, Meryl discusses making the distinction between true north and target conditions. Transitioning from theory to action can cause confusion. Communication Kata follows the same structure as Improvement Kata using a plan of action (PDCA) to avoid such confusion. But how do you measure the success of your communication? Meryl says her philosophy – “Say what you mean, mean what you say and don’t be mean when you say it” - has evolved as a result of her introduction to Toyota Kata. Her philosophy now includes accountability, trust and sincerity. And to take it one step further, she adds that communication should be dynamic. It should spark and inspire others to their best potential. Successful communication is collaborative, where ideas cross-pollinate, and result in unexpected discoveries and surprises.

Listen in on Dwight’s 3rd and final conversation with Meryl Runion, creator of The SpeakStrong method, to hear all about it, and visit www.speakstrong.com to learn even more about Meryl, The SpeakStrong philosophy and her books.

Posted by: GBMP | January 17, 2012

e2 #5: The Kata Mindset with Meryl Runion

(If you can’t see the player in your email, visit the website, www.leanthinkingnetwork.org to listen.)

Part 2 of 3: Inclusion, and the challenge of creating a different way of thinking

Do you practice lean the way a doctor practices medicine or a lawyer practices law? What is the significance of changing the words you use when communicating with your team from declarative to generative terms (practicing lean versus doing lean)? Listen in on Dwight’s 2nd conversation with Meryl Runion, creator of The SpeakStrong method, to hear all about it, and visit www.speakstrong.com to learn even more about Meryl, The SpeakStrong philosophy and her books.

Stay tuned for Part 3 next week:  “Communication Kata: The PDCA cycle for communication and measuring success.”

Part 1 of 3: What gets in the way of creating new habits?

Meryl Runion writes about how to speak strong and lean – how to communicate in a way that is pull based, collaborative, efficient and customer-focused. The true value of her method is in the thinking behind the phrases. Lean and continuous improvement also involve creating a vision of perfection to strive toward. The SpeakStrong Method is based on universal principles of effective communication with practical applications and specific phrases for the challenges of today’s business world. It is lean-aligned and kata-based for continuous communication improvement.

And, once you crack the code and develop the magic ear and eye, communication excellence becomes simple, easy and natural. Learn more about Meryl, The SpeakStrong philosophy and her books at www.speakstrong.com

Stay tuned for Part 2 next week: The Kata mindset – Inclusion and the challenge of creating a different way of thinking

Posted by: GBMP | December 16, 2011

Lean Thinking Network 2012 tentative schedule

LEAN THINKING NETWORK
2012 PROPOSED MEETING CALENDAR
MONTH DATE TIME
January
February 16 8:30 – 11:30 am
March 8 8:30am – 4:30pm
April 12 8:30 – 11:30 am
May 10 8:30 – 11:30 am
June 14 8:30am – 4:30pm Adhesives Research
July No Meeting
August 9 8:30 – 11:30 am
September 13 8:30 – 11:30 am
October 18 8:30am – 4:30pm
November 8 8:30 – 11:30 am
December 13 8:30 – 11:30 am
Posted by: GBMP | December 16, 2011

SACS Podcast #3: Cellular Flow

GBMP Continuous Improvement Manager Bob Elliott discusses how cellular flow reduces lead-time, cost, improves quality and reduces frustration.

Posted by: GBMP | December 12, 2011

Summary – LTN meeting at Rose Corporation 12/8/11

Subject – Effective measures for difficult times.

Member Companies Attending:

  • Adhesives Research
  • Restek Corp.
  • Misco Products

Measures discussed included:

  • On-time delivery – a standard method for calculation
  • Inventory accuracy
  • Closed jobs
  • Value Add
  • Total Lead Time

The plant tour focused on small but frequent improvements coming from the shop floor.  A very impressive tour.  Good job Rose!

The afternoon was spent in a Value Stream Mapping training session, presented by Dwight Bowen

Posted by: GBMP | December 1, 2011

E2 #3: First lead, then manage


(Click to play)

Everyone is a leader in some situations and, once the direction is clearly communicated, must manage a process towards a successful outcome or, if not successful, a process of learning and better understanding the problem at hand.

“Management is efficiency in climbing the ladder of success; leadership determines whether the ladder is leaning against the right wall.”  -Stephen Covey

I have selected six of these qualities, those that I believe to be the most powerful from the list. I believe an effective leader:

  1. Communicates philosophy & values. Sets organizational direction, embracing and sharing organizational value, defining the organization from the inside clearly expressing how the organization is viewed  by the marketplace. Makes it clear who we are. The organization is not a product or a service but a value-based organization. An example: All decisions are made by testing their effect on our values.  1st- We communicate to our customers our beliefs (ex: our belief is to challenge the status quo of all our products and services, always using the scientific method to make improvements), 2nd- our products and services design reflects this culture of innovation, and 3rd- all our products and services are of the highest quality provided at a competitive cost.  Excellent leaders always speak about values and beliefs first.
  2. Explains the reasons for an activityMotivation is difficult when you don’t know why something needs to be done/changed/improved.  We all need an answer as to why we need to make this change, a compelling answer clearly, consistently and effectively communicated to all involved.
  3. Has a strong sense of urgencyWe thrive when leadership presents both urgency and patience.  Urgency to improve a condition and patience with the PDCA process, the scientific process, one of discovery.  It is clear to me that excellent leaders have your back.  Don’t be afraid to make a mistake, just be certain you learn from it.
  4. Is humble.  Leaders with big egos often create a team of meek followers or silent objectors.  The good ideas come from the boss, the little ones from someone below him or her.“The chief executive who knows his strengths and weaknesses as a leader is likely to be far more effective than the one who remains blind to them. He also is on the road to humility, that priceless attitude of openness to life that can help a manager absorb mistakes, failures, or personal shortcomings.” – John Adair……..and this leadership mindset creates loyal and passionate followers.   
  5. Makes hard work worth it.  If there is a noble cause to follow, stated in leadership’s philosophy and values and we know why changes need to be made, hard work becomes rewarding and less difficult……the easier part of Dr. Shingo’s “easier, better, faster, cheaper” phrase.
  6. Is courageous –  “There is nothing more difficult to take in hand, more perilous to conduct or more uncertain in its success, than to take the lead in the introduction of a new order of things.”  -Niccolo Machiavelli. Excellent leaders cannot be fearful of making mistakes.  If the organization is not improving it is likely losing it’s competitive edge.

First we lead using the organizations shared values, then we keep focused on those values.

  • What do you think makes a good leader?
  • What do some leaders do to unintentionally diminish their organization?
  • Read More…

Older Posts »

Categories